InVideo AI Review
4.0
Free (watermarked, weekly export cap)
Visit InVideo AI →Prompt-to-finished-video with script and voiceover
Who it's for
InVideo AI fits marketers, agencies, and solo creators who want a single tool to go from a text idea to a fully edited, voiced marketing or social video without touching a traditional NLE.
Who it's not for
Users who only need raw AI-generated video clips (not a full script-to-edit pipeline) may find dedicated generators like Runway, Luma or Kling cheaper per clip since InVideo's pricing bundles editor and stock costs on top of generation.
Pricing
| Plan | Price | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Free | $0/mo | InVideo watermark on every export, limited weekly export quota |
| Plus | $20/mo billed annually ($25/mo monthly) | No watermark, 50 AI generation minutes/mo, 80 iStock downloads/mo, 2 voice clones, up to 120 voiceover min/mo, no 4K |
| Max | $48/mo billed annually ($60/mo monthly) | 200 AI generation minutes/mo, 320 iStock downloads/mo, 5 voice clones, higher-tier model access |
| Generative | $120/mo | Bundles premium model access including Sora 2 and Veo 3.1 within InVideo's editor, for heaviest AI generation use |
Pros
- Full text-prompt-to-finished-video pipeline: script, voiceover, stock footage, and editing generated together, not just raw clips
- Access to 200+ third-party image/video/audio models (Veo, Kling, Seedance, etc.) inside one editor via credits
- Built-in AI voice cloning and large iStock stock-footage library on paid plans
- Good fit for ad/marketing video creation without manual editing skills
Cons
- AI generation minutes, stock downloads, and voice clones are separate metered pools that don't roll over month to month
- Free plan is watermarked with only a small weekly export allowance
- 4K export is locked behind higher tiers; underlying third-party model costs can push effective per-video cost up quickly
